Femeiewiweioweo exp

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/12/fringe-left-alt-right-share-beliefs-white-power-movement/672454/  crunchyism has a leftist feminists who crossover with white power sects (All of these are often thought of as leftist or “hippie” issues, but they appeared regularly in the robust outpouring of women’s publications in the white-power movement.)  , also there are tradwives, mid wives within crunchyism in the right wing of crunchyism, below is a way to mix the left feminists who sometimes intersect with white power right wingers in the crunchy movement with the tradwives on the right of said movement into one syncretic political ideology

A type of committed, strong willed feminism (femanaughtzi since the crunchcy movement woman power feminists /left feminists and tradwifery combined can cause crunchyism's womens views to be labeled as femanaughtzie (but for syncretic reasons not for reasons feminists are called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminazi today)

 that includes is highly critical of regressive 2.0 feminism (Haz tweet but changed https://web.archive.org/web/20230424001926/https://twitter.com/InfraHaz/status/1527363534727876610,  this type of weird feminist-white power intersection hazs criticizes is like the syncreticness of the feminism in the crunchy movement but here I use haz's critique  feminism and karen saviorism where he says feminists are wrong to project their daddy issues and inferiority onto blacks and to be their savior since they see themselves as like blacks,  so like the right wingers in the crunchy movement i critique feminism and feminists helping blacks but with me and unlike said rightoids, but like with haz in tweet i am critiquing a diff type of feminism and karen saviorism since critiquing that type of 'feminism' - saviorism is acceptable to haz who is a leftist and some of other leftists too)

This type of feminism is Radical-Libertarian feminism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminazi article says femainazis are mostly or largely radical feminists, here i use radical libertarian feminism as an alternative to that   http://www.yorku.ca/mlc/sosc3990A/projects/radfem/radfem2.html#:~:text=Radical%2DLibertarian%20Feminism,-According%20to%20Tong&text=They%20often%20argue%20that%20women's,to%20be%20full%20human%20persons.

Chap2a

University of Oregon

https://pages.uoregon.edu › OregonCourses › Tong06

Both Radical Cultural Feminism (RCF) and Radical Libertarian Feminism (RLF) agree that the oppression of women stands as the oldest, most widespread, ... Women

Weber State University

https://faculty.weber.edu › kmackay

Radical-Libertarian Feminism. Radical-Libertarian feminists believe that femininity and reproduction limit women's capacity to contribute to society.

Radical-Libertarian Feminism

Prezi

https://prezi.com › adb_-lxdnun_ › the-radical-libertar...

The theory is based on the idea of male supremacy being the cause of women's oppression. It is divided into two; radical-libertarian feminism and radical- ...

radical-libertarian feminism of the main character in kate ...

undip.ac.id

http://eprints.undip.ac.id › yeremia

by Y Yeremia · 2018 — This research talks about finding the significance of the main character's actions and how integrated her actions are to the radical-libertarian feminism world.

 fused with Cultural radicalist feminism so it can be called Radbert Culrad feminism (cultural radicalism is code for left wing, this is basically a more neoliberal left version of radical feminism or radical feminism with the radical being from cultural radicalism, radical feminism also meshes with crunchyism)

Radbert Culrad feminism has a zealous Feminist-Everyday Feminist version of my abortion views here (feminiazis are stereotyped to be pro abortion like margaret sanger so the above version of my abortion views basically is a feminaughtzie stereotypical view on abortion)

Radbert Culrad feminism advocates for women playing important roles in our organizations and institutions while using autonomy to mobilize women  NDSAP germany, REAL feminaughtzies, further meshes with the naughtize element of the crunchy movement more so than the psuedo feminazzzzis above0

Depending on the circumstances there might be some bureaucratic feminism as part of Radbert Culrad feminism who would promote love connections (marriage), women being lightbringers (mothers bringing life into the world),   Elizabeth Cady virtuism (femininity) , feminist empowered femininity (femininity) that is pried away from the insipid, inferior meanings that plague it  (like from weakness, helplessness, fragility, passivity, frivolity, and artificiality i.e In her 2007 book Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity, American transsexual writer and biologist Julia Serano offers a transfeminist critique of femininity, notable especially for its call to empower femininity:[113][114]

Serano notes that some behaviors, such as frequent smiling or avoiding eye contact with strangers, are considered feminine because they are practised disproportionately by women, and likely have resulted from women's attempts to negotiate through a world which is sometimes hostile to them.[113]: 322 

Serano argues that because contemporary culture is sexist, it assigns negative connotations to, or trivializes, behaviours understood to be feminine such as gossiping, behaving emotionally or decorating. It also recasts and reimagines femininity through a male heterosexual lens, for example interpreting women's empathy and altruism as husband-and-child-focused rather than globally focused, and interpreting women's interest in aesthetics as intended solely to entice or attract men.[113]: 327–8 

)  NDSAP germany, REAL feminaughtzies, further meshes with the naughtize element of the crunchy movement more so than the psuedo feminazzzzis above0

Radbert Culrad feminism pushes for high amounts of women to be incorporated into the public sector and advocates for full mobilization of women in commerce. Women would be more visible in the work field in this system NDSAP germany, REAL feminaughtzies,

Radbert Culrad feminism is a small but growing feminist movement made up of these type of feminists  (militant confeds= right wingers in crunchyism ,  militant confed feminists=femenaughtzies

and these type of feminists (feminist who said she would embrace femenaughtzie stereotypes to empower women if the name feminaughtize wasnt so over the top and offensive) who are on a quest for power by realizing that men are optional and not needed

Radbert Culrad feminism is domineering,  and against gender/sex stereotypes (while embracing Masculine Feminism and or Female masculinity)   femanaughtzi 

Radbert Culrad feminism is hyper vigilant to sexism and puritanical and also is inspired by Avenger feminism 

Radbert Culrad feminism is hardline feminist, won't compromise on women's rights, goes beyond tolerance,  and is assertive femanaughtzi 

Radbert Culrad feminism is about feminists having empathy (see themselves in) with bipoc males and realize that both groups struggle under the patriarchy/white ethnocracy (white patriarchy Cornel West for latter). i.e 'women are key to bipoc liberation'  https://web.archive.org/web/20230424001926/https://twitter.com/InfraHaz/status/1527363534727876610 but i make this regressive feminism and saviorism haz critiques more mainstream , yes i both support haz's critique of regressive feminism, and karen saviorism and support said regressive feminism and karen saviorism since the crunchymovement has such catch all, woman empowerment to tradwife to red pilled left feminist women views and intersecition and crunchyism a horseshoe red green brown alliance so me playing both sides of feminism by echoing hazs critique of feminism and karen saviorism is similar to crunchiysim in that regard, me supporting the regressive feminism and the saviorism haz critiques in the tweet reps the womans power, left feminists in cruncyhism and also their regressive nature of saviorism and hogging up the liberation movement, me supporting haz's tweet  reps the tradwives, anti black bigots and red pilled left feminists in crunchyism since like them i am crtiqiuing feminism including intersectional feminism (just like haz did in his tweet), also by joining haz in critiquing said feminism and saviorism i could also be echoing left feminists in the crunchy movement since they are leftist like haz and they too are against saviorism (diff reason than rightoids are against it), and against whites projecting bad things onto blacks

Radbert Culrad feminism spaces avoid white saviorism (i.e feminists take haz's advice and stop helping blacks due to their own insecurity and projections) and have their own spaces, along with intersectional coalition spaces of Radbert Culrad feminist with bipoc Men’s Liberation spaces https://web.archive.org/web/20230424001926/https://twitter.com/InfraHaz/status/1527363534727876610

Radbert Culrad feminism also has elements of Egoist feminist anarchism (selfish) as a core ideology  see here

Radbert Culrad feminism is at the center of the liberation movements for marginalized groups in general   see here 

Radbert Culrad feminism is based also on drawing on their own personal experiences and is hostile to supreme authority, hierarchy within the state, and vulgar Isolationism  see here

Radbert Culrad feminism is against people being left to fend for themselves against oppression.   see here

Radbert Culrad feminism also embraces FLINTA. Radbert Culrad feminism would intersect with bipoc as allies in their quest to abolish patriarchy and toxic masculinity  see here . It would also have elements of Post Colonial feminism and Anarcha version of this type of liberation ideology (not the antiracism that haz criticized of feminists he trashed but something that trasncends anti racism in a classical liberal/liberal 1.0 way which i was gonna use in future blog before i started my main blogs but here i add anarcha to said transcending anti racism in liberal 1.0, classic liberal way to make it leftish and feel like the antiracism of those regressive feminists/karen saviors)  see here

-00-00-0-

Regressive 2.0 feminism is: (me echoing Haz in critiquing intersectional feminism from top of page)

White Karens (white women), white Latte Liberal feminists/Bourgeois Feminists (feminists) and radical liberal femcels (white women and feminists) (along with their allies of all sexes/genders) 

White Karens, white Latte Liberal feminists/Bourgeois Feminists and radical liberal femcels  (along with their allies of all sexes/genders) have always sadly projected onto black people their own problems with men.

They wrongly don't see black people as their fellow persons, they wrongly don't have respect for or acknowledge black men or black power. They wrongly perceive black people as a reflection of themselves

This is a form of narcissism.

This is the reason that White Karens, white Latte Liberal feminists/Bourgeois Feminists and radical liberal femcels  (along with their allies of all sexes/genders)  believe they are the answer for 'liberation' of all oppressed groups (like through Intersectional feminism and most waves of Fourth Wave feminism)

In their minds,  'oppression' is about the dissatisfaction with their dads and male spouses that they themselves possess. This is how come they do not respect the sovereignty and the independence of others

These White Karens, white Latte Liberal feminists/Bourgeois Feminists and radical liberal femcels  (along with their allies of all sexes/genders) are thus in actuality gendering all non-whites as feminine.

They detest non white males. Their anti racism is due to them having infantilized and feminized non-whites as an arm of their war against their dad.