fake xplain rep partuclian
Fictional Republican party 1:
National Liberalism (used in previous pre main blog now used here, moved from somewhere else in current blog sphere), civil nationalism (named civil not civic nationalism), eco capitalism, green conservatism, Ukraine type of Liberal Nationalism (anti authoritarian), mixed with conservative liberalism (the liberalism part of conservative liberal would be the type of liberalism I would be if I kept being a proto liberal 2.0 after 2009 especially in NJ)
https://www.reddit.com/r/newwackyideologies/comments/q5fswc/donnellism_the_ideology_of_the_fictional/ my version of civnat and con lib i added uke lib nat too
Fictional Republican party 2:
Askaliberal republicanism , with this as the 'fringe' wing
Fictional Republican party 3:
Horseshoe national centrism ('Republican party are the real Progressives' party ideology and this type of real progressive ideology), Reformist Right Pragressivism (combo of pragmatic and progressive)
Fictional Republican party 4:
Reformist right prog:
FH Buckley Progressive Conservatism 'Right wing Marxism',Theoretical Compassionate Postliberal Integralism and futurist fusionism
https://isi.org/modern-age/fusionism-once-and-future/ (for
Left wing con:
This type of Left wing Conservatism and this type of Left Wing conservatism
This type of Left wing Conservatism and this type of Left Wing conservatism
This type of Left wing conservatism retroactively supports left wing social and economic policies being implemented and accepted, centuries, millennias many many many decades before they happened in our world. It is basically Novelitism (off compass Progressivism) and Reverse conservatism
This type of Left wing conservatism contains my alternative version of Cultural Marxism
This type of left wing conservatism is a deja-vu type ideology . Like 'what old is new again'/try something new
It is to right wing conservatism what socialism is to capitalism (see Fred Hampton quote here source:stupidpol for what I mean). Maybe something like Urbanism
It can also be described as sociological leftism (codeword for progressive moved from my main blogs where i used my opposition to it as code for me being anti progressive), radicalist synthesis futurism (backed up here https://archive.ph/UY2wo), Radical Leftism reddit, Maoist utopianism (shitpolsays,
and or this type of postmodernism (Julius Evola ride the tiger from here https://archive.ph/S9XgJ)
(radicalism is opposite of conservatvism/tradition more so than progressivism source quora, online may 9 2023)
Like retroactively supporting same sex marriage being legalized in the US etc in the 1700s , 1800s or at the latest in the 1990s, in Europe in BC times, Middle Ages, Industrial era or at latest sometime in the 20th century
(Example):
To blindly want gays to retroactively have the same rights and freedom from ‘discrimination’ in BC times through the late 20th century that gays in the US, Europe and Canada have now and in the future.
Where same sex marriage was one of the US’s original, founding era understanding of what marriage is and where the US constitution on same sex marriage from the 18th century onward was always like it has been since 2015 .
Though the right for same sex couples to marry could always be found in the Constitution since the late 18th century if someone wanted to decipher it, it wasn’t deciphered to permit same sex marriage until 2015) . Moreover, this quote from Barry Goldwater “ I am pretty secure in feeling that discriminating against gays is constitutionally wrong.” , further solidifies that line of reasoning
If being gay was and is always as normal and accepted as being straight was and is always normal and accepted, there wouldn't be any homophobes or anti gay resentment in the 20th century or 21st century since in that world, being gay (like straight) would be seen as traditional and normal and thus there would be one less excuse for anti gay people to be anti gay. There is no going back on gay rights so we must make the future like that and more moved from main blogs also jives w 4pt a temporal, common good consititon, diverse views on nat rights, etc,
Like retroactively supporting women having full equal rights to men in the US in the 1700s , 1800s or at the latest in the 1990s, in Europe in BC times, Middle Ages, Industrial era or at latest sometime in the 20th century
Like retroactively supporting trans rights (and trans visibility) in the US in the 1700s , 1800s, early 20th century, mid 20th century or at the latest in the 1990s, in Europe in BC times, Middle Ages, Industrial era or at latest sometime in the 20th century
This would involve using fictional revisionism/PC history, getting historians and others to digg up proof that new progressive and leftist policies implemented in the present, future or that have been implemented in the last few decades were done in the past decades, centuries or millenia ago somewhere and sometime in history etc.
This also involves funding heavy research into time travel to go back in time and literally retroactively implement left wing and progressive policies millenias, centuries or at worst many many many decades before they were in implemented in our reality
This means for example maybe literally going back in time to retroactively make the US in the 1870s, or 1930s or 1960s as equal, evolved, and tolerant/accepting on minority rights/LGBTQ rights/women's rights as it is now in the 2020s .
This means for example maybe literally going back in time to retroactively make the US as green friendly in the 1900s decade or in the 1940s or in the 1990s s Denmark is in the 2020s or 2030s . Or maybe literally going back in time to like the 13th century Europe to make it like the 2070s US in terms of science, medical technology, health and transhumanism. Or maybe literally going back time to retroactively make the 1890s US, or 1960s US or the 1970s/1980s Chile etc be as trans friendly and free for trans people as Canada and California is for trans people in the 2040s
Also see here
This type of left wing conservatism also involves supporting all left wing and progressive policies over the last decades and in the future as being something that would fit in perfectly during traditional eras of the past
For example it could mean like supporting this for above reasons .It could mean supporting electric cars because electric cars seem like something that should have been common in the 20th century
It could mean supporting transhumanism as a left wing version of eugenics. It could mean supporting equity because you'd think equity would have been the thing pushed in the bible, by Quakers, from the Enlightenment , through the 19th century (i.e Abraham Lincoln 'all men created equitable' instead of equal) and onward through the early 21st century, instead of equality (with something on the left/lean left replacing equity in the 2020s like equity replaced equality on the left/lean left).
It could mean supporting bdsm shows for kids/kids being in family friendly bdsm shows since that would be as rough and tough for kids as life was rough and tough for kids in the 19th century, early 20th century, mid to mid late 20th century (but in different way)
It could mean supporting a war on xmas since leftists and wokesters going against xmas feels like conservatives going against LGBT rights, women's rights, minority rights etc
It could mean supporting non binary rights since having more genders beside men and women would have been something we'd should have seen from the creation of life since 2 genders for thousands/millions of years until recently seems too low for a crazy world like ours. It could mean maybe supporting trans rights and visibility (and sex and gender being one) to give a whole new, unique spin on our past cis male/cis female historical cultural social and civil past.
It involves conserving the progressiveness and leftism of the future
Left wing conservatism may mean literally reversing time to create a political renewal, reclamation, resurrection, kick start as we literally reverse time
This left wing conservatism isn't conservatism as much as it is the left wing equivalent of conservatism (but in a more real and literal way as seen above):
Clarence Thomas in 2008 on Harry Reid's Insults
Patterico's Pontifications
https://patterico.com › Judiciary
Jan 11, 2010 — Thus, stories like this are the liberal equivalent of conservatives who fail to live up to family values. It's a valid and effective point, ...
United Humanists
https://m.facebook.com › posts
Isn't this just the liberal equivalent of conservatives doing stupid things to "own the libs"? 2 jam Lapor. John Smith, profile picture.
Maybe a renaissance as mentioned here, and below:
real life Culture Marixm
Real life version of Cultural Marxism BUT the Marxism in this Cultural Marxism is a mix of:
Peruvian/Pedro Castillo Marxism:
Anti-Imperialism
Christian Socialism
Conservative Socialism
Federalism,
Humanism
Pedro Castillo like on LGBTQ issues
Marxism-Leninism
Pan-Hispanism/ Pan American
Social Conservatism
WITH
Real life version of Cultural Marxism BUT replace the critical theory in Cultural Marxism with Eagleton's After Theory (source critical theory reddit) with impactful elements of Minima Moralia (source critical theory reddit) and Post structuralism
OR
Real life version of Cultural Marxism BUT the Marxism in this Cultural Marxism is Nick Land Marxism (see here, here)
WITH
Real life version of Cultural Marxism but replace the postmodernism in Cultural Marxism with a fusion of Hypermodernity with a Left Nazbol vortex (i.e left wing version of the nazbol vortex, moved from values post in main blog and real blog also was in private blog for awhile before i removed it) version of the Fourth Political theory transcendal modernism
OR
Real life version of Cultural Marxism BUT replace the Marxism in Cultural Marxism with a Slavo Zizek-Hegelian form of Engelism (Fred Engels rpl Karl Marx)
WITH
The post modernism in Cultural Marxism with Most post modernism with a touch of actual post modernism
OR
Real life version of Cultural Marxism but with the Marxism in Cultural Marxism replaced with ᛘ㉄ ᴙ𑑛ismism and with true *Post structural ᛘ㉄ ᴙ𑑛ismism (see here) unlike fake Cultural Marxism which includes a fake mix of Post Structuralism and Marxism
with
Real life version of Cultural Marxism with Jung incorporated into the Critical theory in Cultural Marxism (critical theory reddit)
OR
The Neomarxism in Cultural Marxism replaced with Neo Marxism Leninism and the dialectical materialism in the Marxism within Cultural Marxism replaced with new materialism (source critical theory reddit)
A hypothetical fictional strand of Marxism that is as different from Karl Marx's Marxism as William Godwin's Anarchism is different from PJ Proudhon's Anarchism (like Mutualism) and Max Stirner's Anarchism (like Egoism) and as different as PJ Proudhon's Anarchism is different from Max Stirner's Anarchism etc (see here for more on what I mean) .
This hypothetical fictional strand of Marxism is part of Marxism just as William Godwin's Anarchim, PJ Proudhon's Anarchism (like Mutualism) and Max Stirner's Anarchism (Egoism) are part of Anarchism
We can call this hypothetical fictional strand of Marxism : ᛘ㉄ ᴙ𑑛ismism
First letter is a runic long branch madr letter M replacing english letter M in Marxism,
second letter is Circled Ideograph Question ? means unknown ideology which this diff Marxist philosophy is , ideograph sounds like ideology, circle with said symbols looks like a in Marxism
third letter backward r like toys r us to show this is different Marxist philosophy, it replaces reg r
last letter is a placeholder box with x in it replacing x, placeholder box w x because this different Marxist philosophy is unknown caz it doesnt exist in our reality, x in placeholder box to show it is related to Marxism but different, the ism ism is to show the vagueness of this unknown fictional type of Marxism ismism is an ideology on polcompball
https://meaningpolthismeblogpriv.blogspot.com/2023/05/linkle.html Poststructural ᛘ㉄ ᴙ𑑛ismism is a real life fusion of Postructuralism and ᛘ㉄ ᴙ𑑛ismism that fuses Poststructuralism and ᛘ㉄ ᴙ𑑛ismism the same way that Julie Graham fuses Post Structuralism and Marxism together, the same way that Michael Peters fuses Post Structuralism and Marxism together, the same way that Louis Althusser fuses together Post structuralism and Marxism together, the same way that Poststructuralism and Marxism are fused together by Laclau and Mouffe, the same way that Poststructuralism and Marxism are fused together here, here, here, here,
Comments
Post a Comment